Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 24, 2024
Accepted
Jun 11, 2024
Published
Jul 7, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 379 Download : 390

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Shafi'i madhhab followers constitute a majority among Muslims in North Sumatra. This article aims to explore the fatwa methodology and the impact of madhhab influences on decisions issued by the North Sumatra MUI. The research seeks to identify which Sunni schools of thought guide the MUI's fatwa decisions. This paper addresses two main issues: the methodology employed by the North Sumatra MUI in issuing fatwas, and the influence of madhhab thinking on fatwas, particularly those related to prayers issued between 2000 and 2010. To analyze the fatwa methodology of the North Sumatra MUI, this article employs three theories of legal interpretation: bayÄni, ta'lÄ«lÄ« and istislÄhÄ«. The approach taken in this paper invoããlves content analysis, specifically examining fatwa texts to address the research focus. This study centers on referencing Madhhab perspectives found in the official fatwa decisions of the North Sumatra MUI. This study is crucial to assess the extent of Madhhab influence on issued fatwas, particularly within the regional context at the provincial level. Methodologically, the study found that the North Sumatra MUI employs three approaches in its fatwa process: bayÄni, ta'lÄ«lÄ« and istislÄhÄ«. Regarding the influence of Madhhab thinking, the study discovered that the North Sumatra MUI referenced the viewpoints of the four Madhhabs' imams in the three fatwas analyzed. Based on this research, it is evident that the fatwas draw from not only the Shafi'i school but also from the other three schools. Among the fatwas analyzed, the Hanafi school predominates, appearing in all three cases, with the Shafi'i school appearing twice, and the Maliki and Hanbali schools each appearing once.

Keywords

Method Fatwa MUI of North Sumatra

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Heri Firmansyah, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Doctor and a lecturer in Islamic law at the North Sumatra State Islamic University, Medan. which focuses on fatwa research and current issues regarding Islamic law.

How to Cite
Rahmadi, F., & Firmansyah, H. (2024). The Methodology of Fatwa Issuance and the Impact of the School of Thought (Madhhab) on Fatwas by the North Sumatra MUI . Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8492

References

  1. Amin Abdullah, Mencari Islam, Studi Islam Dengan Berbagai Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana Yogya, 2000.
  2. Arafah, Acme Admira, Ahmad Qorib, and Ardiansyah. “Corak Mazhab Pada Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (Analisis Tentang Mudharabah, Musyarakah Dan Murabahah).” AT-TAFAHUM: Journal of Islamic Law 2, no. 1 (July 11, 2019): 18–36.
  3. As-Syaukānī, Imam. Imam Fath Al-Qadīr. Vol. 4, n.d.
  4. Bakhtiar. “Epistimologi Bayani, Ta’lili dan Istislahi Dalam Pengembangan Dan Pembaharuan Hukum.” TAJDID : Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman dan Ushuluddin 18, no. 1 (April 22, 2019): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.15548/tajdid.v18i1.131.
  5. Bakri, Asafri Jaya. Konsep Maqasid Syari‘ah Menurut Imam Syatibi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.
  6. Departeman Agama. Himpunan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Jakarta, 2003.
  7. Fatwa Al-Lajanah al-Daimah Lil Buhus al-‘alamiyah. Vol. 10, n.d.
  8. Firmansyah, Heri. “Kajian Metodologis Terhadap Fatwa MUI Tentang Rokok.” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 4, no. 1 (December 31, 2019): 79–96. https://doi.org/10.22515/al-ahkam.v4i1.1829.
  9. Hasyim, Syafiq. “Fatwa Aliran Sesat dan Politik Hukum Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI).” Al-Ahkam 25, no. 2 (October 24, 2015): 241–66. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2015.25.2.810.
  10. ———. “Fatwas and Democracy: Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI, Indonesian Ulema Council) and Rising Conservatism in Indonesian Islam.” TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 8, no. 1 (May 2020): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2019.13.
  11. Ibrahīm al-Khadirī,. Ahkam Al-Masājid Fi Asy-Syarīat al-Islīmiyyah. Arab Saudi: Wizārah as-Syu’ūn al-Islāmiyah wa al-Auqāf, 1419.
  12. Imam Ar-Rafi‘i. Fath Al-Azīz. Vol. 4, n.d.
  13. Imam Nawawi. , Raudāh at-Tālibīn. Vol. 2, n.d.
  14. ———. Al-Majmū‘ Syarh al-Muhazzab. Mesir: Dar al-Fikr, n.d.
  15. Jazairi, Imam. Al-Fiqh ‘alâ al-Mazâhib al-Arba‘ah. Vol. I, n.d.
  16. Lahmuddin Nasution. Umat Bertanya Ulama Menjawab. Bandung: Citapustaka, 2000.
  17. Mun’im, Zainul. “The Epistemology of MUI’s Fatwas on Covid-19: Bayani and Burhani Eclecticism,” n.d., 20.
  18. Oktalita, Frina, and Darlin Rizki. “Analysis of MUI Fatwa Number 17 of 2020 Regarding Kaifiat Prayer Guidelines for Health Workers Who Wear Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) When Treating and Handling Covid-19 Patients.” Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (November 11, 2021): 247. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v6i2.3332.
  19. Shihabuddin ar-Ramli. Kitab Fathur Rahman Bi Syarh Zubad Ibnu Ruslan. Beirut: Markaz Nakhab al-’Ilmiyyah, 2009. https://shamela.ws/book/32197/266.
  20. Supena, Ilyas. “Konstruksi Epistemologi Fikih Pandemik: Analisis Fatwa-Fatwa MUI.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 15, no. 1 (June 11, 2021): 121–36. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i1.4203.
  21. Wahbah Zuhaili. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuhu. Vol. II. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2011.
  22. Widigdo, Mohammad Syifa Amin, and Homaidi Hamid. “The Power of Fatwā in Indonesia: An Analysis of MUI’s Controversial Fatwās.” Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies 14, no. 2 (December 25, 2018): 146–65. https://doi.org/10.18196/AIIJIS.2018.0085.146-165.