Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 21, 2024
Accepted
Jul 16, 2024
Published
Jul 18, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 272 Download : 164

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the use of Van Dading deed in decision 901/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Tmg. Departing from the problem that the Van Dading Deed plays an important role in the settlement of joint property disputes in Indonesia, by providing legal certainty and an efficient settlement mechanism. This research is a doctrinal study with a case approach. This approach is used to analyze court decisions on Van Dading deeds. Legal materials are obtained from court decisions and to strengthen the analysis, this research also uses several scientific articles and research results related to this research issue in order to produce a sharp analysis. This study explores the legal position of Akta Van Dading in the Indonesian legal system, particularly in the context of joint property disputes. This deed, which is produced through mediation, has the same executorial power as a court judgment, ensuring that the agreement reached will be implemented without the need for additional litigation. A case example in this study is Decision 901/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Tmg, which demonstrates the effectiveness of Akta Van Dading in achieving an amicable and binding settlement. Through mediation facilitated by a mediator, the parties to the dispute were able to reach a fair and sustainable agreement. Thus, the Deed of Van Dading not only reduces the court's workload but also encourages faster settlements and lower costs. This research confirms the importance of Akta Van Dading as an essential legal instrument in achieving justice and legal certainty in the settlement of joint property disputes in Indonesia.

Keywords

Van Dading Deed Dispute Resolution Legal Certainty Mediation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Julisa Sistyawan, D., Abdulah Pakarti, M. H., Kurniawan, L. F., Judijanto, L., & Makkawaru, Z. (2024). The Position of the Van Dading Deed in the Settlement of Joint Property Disputes: Study of Decision 901/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Tmg. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8811

References

  1. Andriani, Agustini. ‘Peran Dan Kontribusi Mediator Dalam Mediasi Sengketa Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Sungai Penuh’. Syntax Idea 6, no. 3 (2024): 1498–1506. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i3.3130.
  2. Buitelaar, Edwin, and Niels Sorel. ‘Between the Rule of Law and the Quest for Control: Legal Certainty in the Dutch Planning System.’ Land Use Policy, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.01.002.
  3. Burhan Latip, Ahmad Muhajir, Elly Lestari, dan Muhammad Farid Hasan. 2024. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewarisan Melalui Mediasi: Jalan Terbaik Menyelesaikan Masalah”. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 1 (1):58-67. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v1i1.4.
  4. Edi, Yoyon. ‘Studi Terhadap Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas I B Argamakmur Bengkulu Utara’. Jurnal Panji Keadilan : Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum 1, no. 1 (1 January 2018): 122–36. https://doi.org/10.36085/jpk.v1i1.249.
  5. Farid, Ishlah. ‘Efektifitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Harta Bersama Di Pengadilan Agama Batulicin’. Al-Mabsut Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial 17, no. 2 (2023): 191–202. https://doi.org/10.56997/almabsutjurnalstudiislamdansosial.v17i2.1030.
  6. Fuqoha, Fuqoha. ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesian Perselisihan Non-Litigasi Dalam Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial’. Indonesian State Law Review (Islrev) 2, no. 2 (2020): 119–37. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v2i2.37681.
  7. Hasibuan, Mutiara N P, and Mujiono H Prasetyo. ‘Kedudukan Advokat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia’. Jurnal Ius Constituendum 7, no. 1 (2022): 159. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i1.4629.
  8. Iryadi, Irfan. ‘Kedudukan Akta Otentik Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara’. Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 4 (2019): 796. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1546.
  9. Iyengar, Siddharth, Adam Kravietz, Tyler S Bartholomew, D W Forrest, and Hansel Tookes. ‘Baseline Differences in Characteristics and Risk Behaviors Among People Who Inject Drugs by Syringe Exchange Program Modality: An Analysis of the Miami IDEA Syringe Exchange’. Harm Reduction Journal 16, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-019-0280-z.
  10. Julianty, Vivy, and Mohamad F M Putra. ‘Kedudukan Hukum Akta Penegasan Notaris Terhadap Akta Perubahan Perseroan Terbatas Yang Tidak Didaftarkan’. Jurnal Usm Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 239. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4871.
  11. Karpi, Iwa Kartiwa, Asep Sumaryana, Achmad Buchari, Universitas Padjadjaran, and Jawa Barat. ‘Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik ( JIAP ) Implementasi Program Pencegahan Perkawinan Usia Anak Di Kabupaten Lombok’ 10, no. 1 (2024): 31–39.
  12. Kismawardani, Kartika. ‘Relevansi Notaris Sebagai Pihak Pelapor Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang’. Notarius 16, no. 3 (2022): 1321–32. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i3.42407.
  13. Maharani, Ni M I, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Luh P Suryani. ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Para Pihak Yang Telah Terikat Dalam Perjanjian Arbitrase (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar)’. Jurnal Analogi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 119–23. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.1.1615.119-123.
  14. Mulyanti, Ariska S, Adi Suliantoro, Heri Purnomo, Agnes M J W, and Gilang F Pratama. ‘Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Melalui Proses Mediasi’. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum 22, no. 2 (2023): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.35973/jrs.v3i02.3238.
  15. Murniati, Rilda. ‘Relevansi Dan Kekuatan Hukum Akta Perdamaian Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Bidang Ekonomi’. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no1.590.
  16. Nanda, Pintami, Dominikus Rato, and Ainul Azizah. ‘Kekuatan Mengikat Akta Van Vergelijk Pembagian Harta Bersama Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata’. JURNAL RECHTENS 11, no. 2 (9 December 2022): 205–24. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v11i2.1446.
  17. Ng, Ivy P W. ‘Pelaksanaan Upaya Perdamaian Dalam Perkara Perdata Studi Kasus Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Brebes Nomor 28/Pdt.G/2019/PN BBS’. Jurnal Hukum Politik Dan Kekuasaan 3, no. 2 (2023): 147–59. https://doi.org/10.24167/jhpk.v3i2.6446.
  18. Nurjaman, Muhamad Izazi, and Doli Witro. ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Menurut Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional-Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI)’. Al-Huquq: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Economic Law 4, no. 1 (30 June 2022): 35–62. https://doi.org/10.19105/alhuquq.v4i1.6107.
  19. Permata Adiani, Alifia. ‘Analisis Yuridis Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Objeknya Merupakan Harta Bersama (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sleman NomoR 221/PDT.G.2019/PN.SMN)’. JOURNAL EQUITABLE 6, no. 2 (28 December 2021): 103–20. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v6i2.3219.
  20. Pratama, Gilang Favian, and Ahmad Suryono. ‘Analisis Hak-Hak Anak Pasca Perceraian Orangtua Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak’. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies 1, no. 1 (16 November 2023). https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v1i1.1946.
  21. Pratama, I Gede Arya Agus, Ni Luh Mahendrawati, and Luh Putu Suryani. ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembagian Harta Bersama Yang Dijadikan Jaminan Hutang Melalui Akta Perdamaian’. Jurnal Analogi Hukum 2, no. 2 (20 July 2020): 165–69. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.2.1915.165-169.
  22. Prayuti, Yuyut. ‘Efektivitas Mediasi Dan Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Kesehatan’. Syntax Idea 6, no. 3 (2024): 1533–44. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i3.3165.
  23. PutraAdi, Krisna. ‘Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Mediasi Dalam Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Selong’. JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani 3, no. 2 (23 May 2022): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.46601/juridica.v3i2.203.
  24. Putri, Alya R R, Yunanto Yunanto, and Novira M Sukma. ‘Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penulisan Akta Notaris Dalam Sela-Sela Kosong Buku Pendaftaran Akta’. Notarius 14, no. 2 (2021): 666–80. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43719.
  25. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Temanggung 901/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Tmg (2023). https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaee58521e621a16a575313434303231.html.
  26. Rahman, Tiara A. ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Asuh Anak Setelah Perceraian: Perbandingan Antara Indonesia Dan Inggris’. Jurnal Usm Law Review 7, no. 1 (2024): 248. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.8801.
  27. Ramadhany, Satria, Rosdiana Rosdiana, and Syafrudin Makmur. ‘Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan (Analisis Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 01 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan)’. Journal of Legal Research 2, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v2i3.17611.
  28. Rohman, Saifur. ‘Analisis Putusan No. 0938/Pdt.g/2017/Pa.Jepr Tentang Harta Akibat Perceraian’. Isti`dal : Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (3 November 2021): 68–92. https://doi.org/10.34001/istidal.v8i1.2589.
  29. Sari, Septi W. ‘Mediasi Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016’. Ahkam Jurnal Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2017.5.1.1-16.
  30. Syahputra, M A D, Sariyatun Sariyatun, and Deny T Ardianto. ‘Peranan Penting Sejarah Lokal Sebagai Objek Pembelajaran Untuk Membangun Kesadaran Sejarah Siswa’. Historia Jurnal Pendidik Dan Peneliti Sejarah 4, no. 1 (2020): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v4i1.27035.
  31. Tarfi, Akhyar, and Ikhwan Amri. ‘Reforma Agraria Sebagai Jalan Menuju Perdamaian Yang Berkelanjutan Di Aceh’. Bhumi Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 7, no. 2 (2021): 210–25. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v7i2.509.
  32. Theresia, Fiona, Lanny Kusumawati, and Erly Aristo. ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Beritikad Baik Yang Dirugikan Atas Penetapan Eksekusi Berdasarkan Akta Perdamaian’. Notaire 5, no. 2 (2022): 235–60. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v5i2.34993.
  33. Wardiana, Abdul Malik. ‘Peran Aktif Hakim Dalam Perkara Sengketa Waris Di Pengadilan Agama Sorong’. Muadalah : Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (25 November 2021): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.47945/muadalah.v1i2.646.
  34. Yusriana, Yusriana. ‘Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam’. Juripol 5, no. 2 (18 August 2022): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.33395/juripol.v5i2.11690.