Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 17, 2024
Accepted
Oct 26, 2024
Published
Nov 2, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 164 Download : 70

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study is important to understand the effectiveness of e-Court in handling divorce cases involving mediation, especially in the Class 1A Religious Court of Padang. Although e-Court has improved administrative efficiency and access, there are gaps in the effectiveness of online mediation, especially in cases involving emotional conflict or domestic violence. These limitations indicate the need for a more in-depth approach to addressing the emotional dimension in the e-Court process as well as improving technical support and staff competence. The object of this study is e-Court as a means of divorce proceedings, with a focus on analyzing the effectiveness of the legal process in cases requiring mediation. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method through in-depth interviews and observations. Primary data were obtained from key informants such as judges, e-Court employees, advocates, and the community, while secondary data were taken from related literature. The findings show that e-Court is effective in terms of ease of access, process efficiency, decision quality, and user satisfaction. Although technological infrastructure supports accessibility, improvements in internet access are still needed. E-Court reduces case handling time, but physical interaction is still needed. User satisfaction is high, although there are complaints about the system sometimes experiencing errors, as well as the need for further training for employees to improve competence.

Keywords

Divorce e-Court Mediation Religious Court

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Firdaus, F., Harahap, T. M., Sasralina, R., Syamsurizal, & Zhuliansyah, T. R. (2024). Modernization of Religious Courts: An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Mediation Through E-Court in Resolving Divorce Cases in Padang. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i2.9650

References

  1. Alam, Syariful, Nu’man Aunuh, and Muhammad Luthfi. “E-Court Effectiveness of Religious Courts in Indonesia.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2021), 590:92–97. Atlantis Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.211102.174.
  2. Arifin, H, L Sudirman, R Rahmawati, R Basri, and F Fikri. “Efektivitas Penerapan E-Court Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Parepare.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 3 (2024): 8490–8502. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.
  3. Ariwijaya, Abdul Rachmat, and Palupi Lindiasari Samputra. “Evaluasi Kebijakan Peradilan Elektronik (E-Court) Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 4 (2022): 1104–22. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no4.3303.
  4. Asmaret, Desi, D Desminar, Syaflin Halim, Firdaus, Mursal, and Syamsurizal. “Peningkatan Pemahaman Siswa SMA Muhammadiyah Satu Padang Tentang Akibat Pernikahan Dini.” Journal Of Human And Education 3, no. 4 (2023): 307–12.
  5. Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna, Rinaldi Rosba, Harsya Mahdi, Spyendik Bernadus Blegur, Muhammad Zainal Abidin, Mohammad Fahruz Risqy, Friska Ariesta Aritedi, Gasa Bahar Putra, and Muhammad Rizaldi Rahman. Hukum Acara Peradilan Elektronik Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Makassar: Spasi Media Publishing, 2020.
  6. Custers, Bart. “A Fair Trial in Complex Technology Cases: Why Courts and Judges Need a Basic Understanding of Complex Technologies.” Computer Law & Security Review 52, no. 105935 (April 1, 2024): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLSR.2024.105935.
  7. Djamaludin, Muhammad Fahruddin Aziz, Yanuriansyah Ar-Rasyid, and Iskandar Ali As-Sayyis. “Assessing the Impact of Electronic Court Systems on the Efficiency of Judicial Processes in the Era of Digital Transformation.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (June 27, 2023): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.8082.
  8. Dlaifurrahman, Muhammad. Hukum Islam Perceraian: Analisis Atas Intervensi Mertua. Banyumas: CV. Amerta Media, 2021.
  9. Fikri, Fikri, Muhammad Ali Rusdi Bedong, Muhyiddin Salim, Salman Abdul Muthalib, and Ali Abubakar. “Transformation of Maqāsid Shari‘āh in Divorce Mediation in Religious Courts: Revitalization of the Bugis-Mandar Customs, Indonesia.” Samarah 7, no. 1 (March 31, 2023): 431–54. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.9141.
  10. Firdaus. Psikologi Hukum Keluarga. Padang: UMSB Press, 2024.
  11. Firdaus, Desminar, Syaflin Halim, and Mursal. “Menjelajahi Penerapan Konsep Maslahah Mursala Dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam: Studi Kasus Istri Mencari Nafkah dan Suami Bertanggung Jawab Atas Pekerjaan Rumah Tangga.” Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi Dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam 15, no. 1 (2023): 185–203. https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v15i1.2545.
  12. Firdaus, Desminar, Syaflin Halim, Mursal, and Isral Naska. “The Protection of Islamic Women in Indonesia: Evaluation of Polygamy Sanctions and Its Implications.” KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 31, no. 1 (2023): 79–108. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v31i1.10611.
  13. Firdaus, Mursal, Desminar, and Syaflin Halim. “The Principles of the Concept of Maslahah in Islamic Family Law of a Wife Looking for Living Husband Taking Care of Household Work.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (May 30, 2024): 259–84. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i1.8464.
  14. ———. “Views of Usul Fiqih and Islamic Family Law on Concerned Marriage Cases in Padang City.” Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial 13, no. 2 (2023): 215–33. https://doi.org/10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i2.20373.
  15. Hairani, Wirda, and Syawaluddin Ismail. “Problematika Mediasi Dalam Kasus Perceraian di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Langsa.” Al-Qadha 5, no. 1 (July 1, 2019): 38–47. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v5i1.959.
  16. Hakim, Sholihul, Astri Maharani, Bunga Aldila Putri, Deni Kurniawan, Fandhika Al Khairi, and Thariq Hanif Muhammad Kautsar. “Analisis Ketidakefektifan Pelaksanaan E-Court Dalam Sistem Beracara Di Pengadilan Negeri Mungkid Kelas IB.” Indonesian Research Journal on Education 4, no. 3 (July 9, 2024): 665–71. https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v4i3.831.
  17. Hasyim, Fuad. “Implementasi Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Murah Melalui E-Court.” Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum 8, no. 2 (2022): 255–68. https://doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v8i2.4069.
  18. Hidayat, Khotib Iqbal, Aris Priyadi, and Elly Kristiani Purwendah. “Kajian Kritis Terhadap Dualisme Pengadilan Elektronik (E-Court) Dan Konvensional.” Batulis Civil Law Review 1, no. 1 (October 30, 2020): 14–23. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v1i1.421.
  19. Indonesia, Kementrian Agama Republik. Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indoensia. Jakarta: Kementrian Agama, 2018.
  20. Indonesia, Ketua Makamah Agung Republik. Peraturan Makamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik, Pub. L. No. 3 (2019).
  21. Indonesia, Presiden Republik. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan, Pub. L. No. 1 (1974).
  22. Intihani, Siti Nur, Arifudin Arifudin, and Juliani Juliani. “Efektivitas Persidangan Berbasis E-Court Pada Masa Pendemi Covid 19 Pada Pengadilan Negeri Bekasi.” Veritas 8, no. 1 (2022): 67–81. https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v8i1.1804.
  23. Irawan, Hengki, Zainudin Hasan, Universitas Bandar Lampung, Hengki Irawan, and Zainudin Hasan. “Dampak Teknologi Terhadap Strategi Litigasi Dan Bantuan Hukum : Tren Dan Inovasi Di Era Digital.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 4, no. 2 (March 30, 2024): 4600–4613. https://doi.org/10.31004/INNOVATIVE.V4I2.9735.
  24. Karaagac, Berat, and Kolade M. Owolabi. “A Numerical Investigation of Marriage Divorce Model: Fractal Fractional Perspective.” Scientific African 21, no. e01874 (September 1, 2023): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIAF.2023.E01874.
  25. Karimuddin. Problematika Gugatan Perceraian Dalam Masyarakat Islam (Dilengkapi Analisis Putusan Makamah Syari’iyah Dengan Pendekatan Fiqh). Aceh: Yayasan Penerbit Muhammad Zaini, 2021.
  26. Latifani, Dian, Nur Arif Nugraha, Anis Widyawati, Akhmad Khalimy, Muhammad Iqbal Baiquni, Asmarani Ramli, and Pratama Herry Herlambang. “The Revitalizing Indonesia’s Religious Courts System: The Modernization Impacts and Potentials of E-Court.” Jurnal Hukum Unissula 40, no. 1 (June 4, 2024): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v40i1.32279.
  27. Ligasetiawan, Edwin, and Febby Mutiara Nelson. “Prinsip Kehadiran Terdakwa Pada Persidangan Pidana Elektronik Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Perbandingan Indonesia Dan Belanda.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 1 (July 11, 2022): 69–103. https://doi.org/10.22437/UJH.5.1.69-103.
  28. Padang, Pengadilan Agama Negeri. “Laporan Tahunan.” pa-padang.co.id, 2024. https://pa-padang.go.id/laporan-tahunan/.
  29. Penulis. “Observasi Kinerja E-Court Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Kota Padang.” Padang, 2024.
  30. Putra, Dedi. “A Modern Judicial System in Indonesia: Legal Breakthrough of E-Court And E-Legal Proceeding.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (July 30, 2020): 275–97. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.275-297.
  31. Rasyidin, and Mayang Diwana. “Faktor Perceraian Suami Perantau Dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga.” Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 8, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 144–59. https://doi.org/10.32505/QADHA.V8I2.3577.
  32. Ryan Alan Firnanda, and Zaidah Nur Rosidah. “Efektivitas E-Court Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Surakarta.” Jurnal Supremasi 14, no. 1 (2024): 28–42. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i1.3400.
  33. Shodikin, Akhmad, Asep Saepullah, and Imas Indah Lestari. “Efektivitas Penerapan Sistem E-Court Pengadilan Agama Dalam Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah 4, no. 2 (2021): 135–48. https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v4i2.290.
  34. Studzinska, Joanna Maria. “Electronic Bailiff Files as a Tool for Computerization the Administration of Justice in the Polish Legal System.” In Procedia Computer Science, 192:2943–51. Elsevier, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.066.
  35. Sudirianti, Nelvi. “Wawancara Advokat Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Kota Padang.” 2024.
  36. Sundusiyah, Sundusiyah, and Erie Hariyanto. “Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Tentang E-Court Untuk Mewujudkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan di Pengadilan Agama Pamekasan.” Arena Hukum 15, no. 3 (December 27, 2022): 471–98. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2022.01503.2.
  37. Syarifah, Nur, and Mohammad Kemal Dermawan. “Efektivitas Sistem Kamar Sebagai Model Pencegahan Viktimisasi Struktural Dalam Pemeriksaan Kasasi Pidana.” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 4, no. 4 (2022): 2181–90. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i4.1028.
  38. Wilson-Evered, Elisabeth, and John Zeleznikow. “The Evolution of Family Dispute Resolution and the Need for Online Family Dispute Resolution in Australia.” In Law, Governance and Technology Series, 45:1–16. Cham: Springer, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64645-5_1.
  39. Yus, Zulkifli. “Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkawinan Pada Mahkamah Syar’iyah Di Aceh.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 5, no. 2 (May 12, 2023): 196–223. https://doi.org/10.22373/UJHK.V5I2.17893.