Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 28, 2025
Accepted
Jun 18, 2025
Published
Jun 26, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2 Download : 2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The abstract should describe clearly the content of paper, and should provide a brief introduction to the problem, objective of paper, followed by a statement regarding the methodology and a brief summary of results. Abstracts are written in a single paragraph, 10pt Book Antiqua, no more than 200 words. This study aims to explore students' creative thinking patterns in solving mathematics problems based on Computational Thinking (CT). CT is a thinking approach that involves decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithmic thinking, enabling students to solve problems systematically and efficiently. This research employs an exploratory qualitative method with purposive sampling of five twelfth-grade students at SMK Samudera Indonesia. Data were collected through problem-solving tests, observations, interviews, and worksheet analysis. The findings indicate that students with a high level of creative thinking can effectively apply CT concepts, particularly in decomposition and abstraction. Meanwhile, students with a moderate level of creative thinking still require examples and guidance in recognizing patterns and structuring solutions systematically. The main challenges identified include difficulties in understanding the fundamental concepts of sequences and series, reliance on formulas without deep comprehension, and a lack of confidence in trying different approaches. These findings suggest that incorporating Computational Thinking in mathematics learning can enhance students' creativity in problem-solving while also developing a more logical and systematic mindset.

Keywords

Creative, Computational, Thinking

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)

How to Cite
Wahyuni, D., & Budi Antoro. (2025). Eksplorasi Pola Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berbasis Computational Thinking. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 9(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v9i1.11129

References

  1. Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  2. Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is Involved and What is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community?. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.
  3. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.
  4. Levin, I., Semenov, A. L., & Gorsky, M. (2025). Smart Learning in the 21st Century: Advancing Constructionism Across Three Digital Epochs. Education Sciences, 15(1), 45.
  5. Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017). Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it Fit? A systematic literary review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07659.
  6. Lodi, M., & Martini, B. (2021). Computational Thinking, Between Papert and Wing. Science & Education, 30(3), 573–589.
  7. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Sage Publications.
  8. Tall, D. (1991). Advanced Mathematical Thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  9. Tatag Yuli Eko. (2012). Pengertian Berpikir Kreatif Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis.
  10. Tri Nova Hasti Yunianta, Rochmad, & Ani Rusilowati. (2012). "Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Implementasi Project-Based Learning dengan Peer And Self-Assessment untuk Materi Segiempat Kelas VII SMPN RSBI 1 Juwana di Kabupaten Pati". Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, Yogyakarta, 10 November 2012.
  11. Wahyuni, D & Antoro, B. (2022) Pengembangan Tes Berfikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Universitas Dharmawangsa. Jurnal Warta Dharmawangsa, 16 (4), 893-905
  12. Wahyuni, D & Amalia, M.M. (2022). Pengembangan Tes Berpikir Kritis Akuntansi Terhadap Hasil Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Dharmawangsa. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4 (3),1664-1675
  13. Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M. S., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127-147.
  14. Wing, J. M. (2006)NH. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.