Main Article Content
Abstract
Undergraduate students often struggle to shift froam procedural to conceptual understanding when learning linear transformation. They tend to focus on mechanical procedures while neglecting the underlying concepts. Textbooks play a crucial role in developing conceptual understanding through well-structured and meaningful exercises. Praxeological theory, which maps the relationship among mathematical tasks, techniques, supporting technologies, and underlying theories, provides a comprehensive framework for such analysis. This study aims to analyze linearĀ transformation exercises in Elementary Linear Algebras (11th edition) by Howard Anton and Chris Rorres using a qualitative content analysis based on the praxeological framework. The findings reveal that most exercises have the potential to foster deep conceptual understanding, particularly when learning activities do not stop at the technical stage. Practically, the study offers insights for lecturers and textbook developers in designing exercises that balance procedural demands and conceptual reasoning, thereby enhancing meaningful learning of linear algebra in higher education.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)