Main Article Content

Abstract

Class IX students of SMP Negeri 4 Takengon generally find it difficult to understand the mathematics learning material contained in the school textbook, besides that the teacher also feels that textbooks as teaching materials still do not help students in learning both at school and independently, so it is very necessary to have other teaching materials that can overcome this. Therefore the researcher felt that this research was very suitable to be carried out. This Research and Development (R&D) research uses the Rowntree development model whose goal is to develop math modules with the STEAM approach on curved side space material that is valid and practical for use in junior high school mathematics learning. The development process consists of three stages, namely the planning, development and evaluation stages using the formative evaluation procedure from Tessmer. Based on this development stage, a mathematics module with the STEAM approach has been produced which contains curved side geometrical material and can be categorized as very valid (content validation 4.54 and media validation 4.75) and also very practical based on one to one evaluation (teacher response 96.96% and student response 98.97%) and small group evaluation of 92.11%.

Keywords

STEAM Module Development Rowntree

Article Details

How to Cite
Saputra, E., Yustinaningrum, B., & Nurhayati, N. (2023). Module Development for Curved Side 3D Geometric Shapes Based on STEAM Approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 7(2), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v7i2.7542

References

  1. Anwari, I., Yamada, S., Unno, M., Saito, T., Suwarma, I. R., Mutakinati, L., & Kumano, Y. (2015). Implementation of authentic learning and assessment through STEM education approach to improve students’ metacognitive skills. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 123–136. http://www.k12stemeducation.in.th/journal/article/view/23/24
  2. Baskoro, D., dkk. (2015). Panduan Penggunaan Bahan Ajar. Bandung: Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Nonformal dan Informal (PP-PAUDNI) Regional I.
  3. Devi, P,. dkk. (2018). Materi Bimbingan Teknis Pembelajaran berbasis STEM dalam Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan SEAMEO Regional Center for QITEP in Science.
  4. Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air, Direktorat Bina Operasi dan Pemeliharaan. (2019). Modul Panduan Penyusunan Modul Pelatihan: Bimbingan Teknik Pengembangan Tata Guna Air dalam Rangka Pelatihan Teknis Instruktur PTGA. Jakarta: Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.
  5. Etistika Yuni Wijaya, Dwi Agus Sudjimat, & Amat Nyoto. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1, 263–278. http://repository.unikama.ac. id/840/32/263-278.
  6. Fitriati, & Novita, R. (2015).Pengembangan Pendekatan Rich Task Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Matematika. Numeracy, 21–32.
  7. Hyonyong Lee, Hyuksoo Kwon, Kyungsuk Park, & Hee-Jin Oh. (2014). Development and Application of Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Education Model Based on Scientific Inquiry. Journal of The Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 63–78.
  8. Nasrani, S,. Nur, I,. dan Linda, R. (2018). “Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis PMRI pada Topik Barisan untuk Siswa kelas XI SMA”. Respository UMRAH; Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji.
  9. Oktarinah, O., Wiyono, K., & zulherman, zulherman. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Proyek Materi Alat-Alat Optik Untuk Kelas X Sma. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(1), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.36706/ jipf.v3i1.3433
  10. Prawiradilaga, D. (2009). Prinsip Disain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
  11. Purnamasari, E. (2017). “Pengembangan Modul sebagai Media Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Minat Siswa Kelas X pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi”, Skripsi, Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
  12. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM,STEM Education,STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 20–27. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/51616/STEMmania.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  13. Septiani, A. (2016). “Penerapan Assesmen Kinerja dalam Pendekatan STEM (Sains, teknologi, engineering, matematika) untuk Mengungkap Keterampilan Proses Sains”. Isu-isu Kontemporer Sains, Lingkungan dan Inovasi Pembelajarannya
  14. Setiyadi, M. W. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 3(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v3i2.3468
  15. Wahidah, I,. dan Ipung Y. (2013). “Penerapan strategi Think Talk Write (TTW) untuk Meningkatkaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa kelas VII SMP Brawijaya Smart School (BBS)”. Artikel: Universitas Negeri Malang.