Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the criticism of the sanad and the perspective of Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail in understanding the hadith of the fasting Sunnah of the month of Rajab. According to Syuhudi Ismail, the validity of a hadith can be measured from several conditions, namely ittisal al-sanad, 'adl, dabit, avoiding syaz, and no' illah. whereas, in analyzing the validity of the mind there are four benchmarks, namely not contradicting the Koran, not contradicting a stronger hadith, not contradicting common sense and history, and its structure showing prophetic words. This research is a qualitative research using library research method. The primary data in this study are pole al-sittah and pole al-sab'ah. The data collection methods are takhrij and i'tibar al-hadith. Meanwhile, the analysis uses sanad analysis and hadith observations. The results of this study are from the three hadiths that have been examined, all the narrators that are in the line of the three hadiths are predicated of siqat with the quality of the hadith sahih al-sanad. Meanwhile, the quality of the observations of the three hadiths above can be concluded that the three of them do not contradict the benchmarks used as the benchmark in criticizing the hadith observations, as explained by Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail.

Keywords

Sanad Matan Fasting Rajab Criticism of sanad and matan Syuhudi Ismail

Article Details

How to Cite
Derajat, A. Z. (2021). Criticism of Sanad and Matan Perspective of Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail in Understanding The Hadith of Fasting Sunnah Rajab. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 211-233. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v4i2.2376

References

  1. Ahmad, Afifuddin. Paradigma Baru Memahami Hadis Nabi (Refleksi Pemikiran Pembaharuan Muhammad Syuhudi Ismail). Jakarta: MSCC, 2005.
  2. Ahmad, H. Meraih Surga Dengan Puasa. Jakarta: Puspa Swara, 2007.
  3. Al-Atsari, Abu Ubaidah. “Fenomena Bid’ah Di Bulan Rajab.” Majalah Al-Furqon, July 30, 2004.
  4. Alviennoer, A. Pemahaman Asyhur Al-Hurum Dalam Hijriah Menurut Perspektif Hadis. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2010.
  5. Dhohir, Ridho Ilahi. “Kualitas Hadis-Hadis Viral Tentang Keutamaan Bulan Rajab.” UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2019.
  6. Fauziah, Cut. “I’tibar Sanad Dalam Hadis.” Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 1, no. 1 (2018).
  7. Hanbal, Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn. Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. Juz I. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, T.t.
  8. Ismail, Muhammad Syuhudi. Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi. Jakarta: PT. Bulan Bintang, 2007.
  9. Al-Naisaburi, Imam Abi Husain Muslim ibn Hajjaj al-Qusyairi. Sahih Muslim. Juz II. Cairo: Dar al-Hadis, 1997.
  10. Nuruddin. ’Ulumul Hadis. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.
  11. Rahmah, Siti and Wahyudin Darmalaksana. “Kontroversi Hadis Amalan Sunnah Bulan Rajab.” Jurnal Khazanah Multidisiplin 1, no. 2 (2020).
  12. Setiyanto, D. A. Sebah Catatan Sosial Tentang Ilmu, Islam, Dan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2016.
  13. Siregar, Muhammad Nuh. “Reinterpretasi Hadis Tentang Keutamaan Bulan Rajab, Sya’ban, Dan Ramadan.” Shahih: Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam 1, no. 1 (2018).
  14. Al-Sijistani, Abu Dawud Sulaiman ibn al-Asy’as. Sunan Abu Dawud. Juz II. Cairo: Dar al-Hadis, 1999.
  15. Suryadi. “Rekonstruksi Kritik Sanad Dan Matan Dalam Studi Hadis.” Jurnal Esensia 16, no. 2 (Oktober 2015).
  16. Susilo, Wilhelmus Hary. Penelitian Kualitatif: Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Ilmu Kesehatan. Surabaya: CV. Garuda Mas Sejahtera, 2014.
  17. Syawaluddin. “Kritik Sanad Dan Matan Hadis-Hadis Zuhud.” Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan, 2011.
  18. At-Tahhan, Mahmud. Metode Takhrij Dan Penelitian Sanad Hadis. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu, 1995.
  19. At-Thahan, Mahmud. Taisir Mustalah Al-Hadis. Alexandria: Markaz al-Mada al-Dirasah, T.t.