Main Article Content

Abstract

According to Kamaruddin Amin, the discourse on the authenticity, validity, and reliability of the hadith authentication methodology is the most basic thing in the study of hadith. The doubts of some Muslim scholars over the role of hadith as the second source of authority after the Qur'an, are not entirely related to their rejection of the accuracy of the methodology used in determining the originality of the hadith. If the authentication methodology used is problematic, then all the results achieved from the method are not sterile from the possibility of re-verification, historical criticism and even results can collapse. Doubts also come from the orientalists regarding the authenticity of the hadith. The epistemology of the orientalists with characteristics of skepticism or doubt in terms of testimony and tries to re-question what the hadith really is, is it true that the hadith is the oral speech of the prophet, the prophet's behavior or the perception of the Islamic community about the prophet, is the book of hadith that we inherit from the third century such as Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim, is a reflection of the sunnah of the Prophet? This school of skepticism is represented by Joseph Schacht (Austria) and Ignaz Goldziher (Hungary) and Harald Motzki.

Keywords

Authenticity Originality of Hadith Sceptic

Article Details

How to Cite
Kurniawan, M. I. R. (2021). Theory Dating and Isnad Cum Matn Harald Motzki in Revealing The Authenticity of The Prophet Hadith. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v4i2.3228

References

  1. Adib, Shohibul, “Pemikiran Harald Motzki Tentang Hadis (Telaah Metodologi Penelitian Harald Motzki Terhadap Kitab Al-Musannaf Karya Abdurrazaq As- San’ani)”, Jurnal An-Nidzam. Vol. 4. No. 1. 2017.
  2. Amin, Kamaruddin. “Book Review of the Origin of Islamic Jurisrudence Meccan Fikih Before Classical Scholl”, al-Jami’ah; Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 41, No. 1. 2003.
  3. Amin, Kamaruddin. “Western Methods of Dating vis-a-vis Ulum Hadis: Refleksi Metodologis atas Diskursus Kesarjanaan Hadis Islam dan Barat”(Pidato pengukuhan jabatan Guru Besar UIN Alauddin Ujung Pandang, 2010), http://www.uin-Alauddin.ac.id/ uin-982-html, 5. 13 Mei 2020.
  4. Amin, Kamaruddin. Book Review: The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence Meccan Fiqh before the Classical Schools. Yogyakarta: IAIN Sunan Kalijaga. 2003
  5. Amin, Kamarudin. Metode Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: PT Mizan Publika. 2009.
  6. Arif, Syamsuddin. Orientalis & Diabolisme Pemikiran. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press. 2008.
  7. Darmalaksana, Wahyudi. Hadis di Mata Orientalis. Bandung: Benang Merah Press. 2004.
  8. Idri. Hadis dan Orientalis;Perspektif Ulama Hadis dan Para Orientalis Tentang Hadis Nabi. Depok: Kencana. 2017
  9. Junaidi, M. Rofiq, “Otentitas Hadis Dalam Perspektif Harald Motzki”, Jurnal Al- A’raf. Vol. 12. No. 1. 2015.
  10. Masrur Ali. 2013. “Penerapan Metode Tradition-Historical dalam Musannaf ‘Abd al-Razzaq al-San’ani dan Implikasinya Terhadap Persoalan Dating Hadis dan Perkembangan Fikih Mekkah”, Jurnal Teologia, Vol. 24, No.1. 2013
  11. Masrur, Ali. Teori Common Link G.H.A Juynboll; Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadits Nabi. Yogyakarta: LkiS, 2007.
  12. Motzi, Harald. The Biography of Muhammad: the Isuue of the Sources. Leiden: Brill. 2000
  13. Motzki, Harald. ”Quo Vadis, Hadit-Forschung? Eine Kritische Unterschung von G.H.A Juynboll: Nafi’ the mawla of Ibn ‘Umar, and his position in Muslim Hadit Literature”, jurnal Der Islami, Nijmegon. Vol. 73. 1996.
  14. Motzki, Harald. Hadith: Origins and Devolepments. New York: Routlade. 2016
  15. Motzki, Harald. The Origin Of Islamic Jurisprudence; Meccan Fiqh Before Classical Schools. Leiden: Brill. 2002.
  16. Sumbulah, Umi. Kajian Kritis Ilmu Hadis. Malang: UIN-Malang Press. 2010.
  17. Wazna, Ruhama, “Metode Kontemporer Menggali Otentitas Hadis (Kajian Pemikiran Harald Motzki)”, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin. Vol. 17. No. 2. 2018.