Section Articles

The Debt of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia Against PT. Cipta Marga Nusaphala Persada

Perspective of Good Faith, Adequacy, and Fairness
https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i2.6586
Muh. Reza Zulfikar
Zulfikarr259@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Sorong Muhammadiyah University of Education, Southwest Papua, Indonesia
Suprapto
Pangkalan Bun Antarkusuma University, Central Kalimatan, Indonesia
Rifqi Devi Lawra
Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin University, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Muh. Fachrur Razy Mahka
Makassar Handayani University, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 9, 2023
Accepted
Aug 10, 2023
Published
Aug 12, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 622 Download : 307

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Early June 2023 the majority shareholder of PT. Cipta Marga Nusaphala Persada Jusuf Hamka collected a debt of 800 billion to the government. However, IBRA (National Bank Restructuring ­­­Agency) rejected CMNP's request because the company is affiliated with Bank Yama, so CMNP is not the responsibility of the Government. Therefore, CMNP filed a lawsuit with the South Jakarta District Court up to PK at (MA). In the end, in 2010 the lawsuit was won by CMNP AND the state was burdened with a 2% tax each month on the debt and it was estimated along with interest that the total was 800 billion. However, within 13 years the Government has not settled the debt. Based on this research aims to analyze the position of government debt to CMNP from the perspective of decency and justice. This research is a normative method with a normative juridical approach that uses grammatical and systematic analysis techniques. Secondary legal materials from this study consist of court decisions, related regulations, legal doctrine, and expert opinions. The results of the study show that the government's actions that have not paid off CMNP's debt are actions that violate the principles of good faith and propriety in law because one indication of implementing these principles is fulfilling the agreements made. So that the prohibition of the agreement with CMNP is an act that is inappropriate and not in good faith. In addition, these actions also violated the principle of justice because the Government did not comply with court decisions and agreements with CMNP.

Keywords

Debt Fairness Good Faith Propriety

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan dan Ekonomi Islam published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Zulfikar, M. R., Suprapto, Lawra, R. D., & Razy Mahka, M. F. (2023). The Debt of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia Against PT. Cipta Marga Nusaphala Persada . Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 15(2), 280-290. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i2.6586

References

  1. Adiningtyas, M. (2019). Upaya Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Pelaksanaan Kredit Tanpa Jaminan (Studi Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Artha Jateng). Fh Unnes, 1(3), 12. Https://Lib.Unnes.Ac.Id/35995/
  2. Affandi, C. (2015). Pengaruh Free Cash Flow, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kebijakan Utang Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 1–135.
  3. Putusan Peninjauan Kembali No.564 Pk/Pdt/2007, 33 (2007).
  4. Darus, B. M. (2016). K.U.H. Perdata Buku Iii Hukum Perikatan Dengan Penjelasan. Alumni Press.
  5. Fajri, I. N. (2021). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Dengan Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Kasus Di Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sendang Artha Mandiri Madiun). Akuntansi, 9(1), 26–35.
  6. Hayat, H. (2015). Keadilan Sebagai Prinsip Negara Hukum: Tinjauan Teoritis Dalam Konsep Demokrasi. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal Of Law), 2(2), 388–408. Https://Doi.Org/10.22304/Pjih.V2n2.A10
  7. Kelsen, H. (2016). Teori Umum Tentang Hukum Dan Negara. Bandung: Nusamedia. Nusamedia.
  8. Kurniawan, N. (2013). Hukum Kepailitan ( Studi Komparatif Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Dan Kepailitan ). Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 1(3), 9.
  9. Nursariani Simatupang, R. A. (2020). Kata Sepakat Dalam Perjanjian Dan Relevansinya Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Wanprestasi. Hukum, 5(1), 1–9.
  10. Panggabean, R. M. (2010). Keabsahan Perjanjian Dengan Klausul Baku. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 17(4), 651–667. Https://Doi.Org/10.20885/Iustum.Vol17.Iss4.Art8
  11. Panjaitan, E. L. (2018). Hukum Dan Keadilan Dalam Persfektif Filsafat Hukum. To-Ra, 4(2), 47. Https://Doi.Org/10.33541/Tora.V4i2.1183
  12. Romadhina, A. P. (2018). Pengaruh Free Cash Flow, Non Debt Tax Shield Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang. Jurnal I;Miah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang, 6(1), 97–121. Http://Openjournal.Unpam.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jia/Article/View/1210
  13. Ruman, Y. S. (2012). Keadilan Hukum Dan Penerapannya Dalam Pengadilan. Humaniora, 3(2), 345. Https://Doi.Org/10.21512/Humaniora.V3i2.3327
  14. Sihotang, E. (2017). Itikad Baik Penguasaan Fisik Sebagai Dasar Perolehan Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 269pk/Pdt/2015). Magister Kenotariatan Usu, 01(02), 1–21.
  15. Simamora, N. A., Kamello, T., Sembiring, R., & Leviza, J. (2015). Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Pendahuluan (Voor Overeenkomst) Pada Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negri Simalungun No 37/Pdt/Plw/2012/Sim). Usu Law Journal, 3(3), 84–96.
  16. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D.
  17. Suwardiyati, R. (2020). Penerapan Asas Kepatutan Dalam Perjanjian Kawin. Widya Yuridika, 3(2), 271. Https://Doi.Org/10.31328/Wy.V3i2.1675