The Debt of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia Against PT. Cipta Marga Nusaphala Persada

Perspective of Good Faith, Adequacy, and Fairness

Authors

  • Muh. Reza Zulfikar Sorong Muhammadiyah University of Education, Southwest Papua, Indonesia
  • Suprapto Pangkalan Bun Antarkusuma University, Central Kalimatan, Indonesia
  • Rifqi Devi Lawra Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin University, West Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Muh. Fachrur Razy Mahka Makassar Handayani University, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i2.6586

Keywords:

Debt, Fairness, Good Faith, Propriety

Abstract

Early June 2023 the majority shareholder of PT. Cipta Marga Nusaphala Persada Jusuf Hamka collected a debt of 800 billion to the government. However, IBRA (National Bank Restructuring ­­­Agency) rejected CMNP's request because the company is affiliated with Bank Yama, so CMNP is not the responsibility of the Government. Therefore, CMNP filed a lawsuit with the South Jakarta District Court up to PK at (MA). In the end, in 2010 the lawsuit was won by CMNP AND the state was burdened with a 2% tax each month on the debt and it was estimated along with interest that the total was 800 billion. However, within 13 years the Government has not settled the debt. Based on this research aims to analyze the position of government debt to CMNP from the perspective of decency and justice. This research is a normative method with a normative juridical approach that uses grammatical and systematic analysis techniques. Secondary legal materials from this study consist of court decisions, related regulations, legal doctrine, and expert opinions. The results of the study show that the government's actions that have not paid off CMNP's debt are actions that violate the principles of good faith and propriety in law because one indication of implementing these principles is fulfilling the agreements made. So that the prohibition of the agreement with CMNP is an act that is inappropriate and not in good faith. In addition, these actions also violated the principle of justice because the Government did not comply with court decisions and agreements with CMNP.

References

Adiningtyas, M. (2019). Upaya Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Pelaksanaan Kredit Tanpa Jaminan (Studi Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Artha Jateng). Fh Unnes, 1(3), 12. Https://Lib.Unnes.Ac.Id/35995/

Affandi, C. (2015). Pengaruh Free Cash Flow, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kebijakan Utang Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 1–135.

Putusan Peninjauan Kembali No.564 Pk/Pdt/2007, 33 (2007).

Darus, B. M. (2016). K.U.H. Perdata Buku Iii Hukum Perikatan Dengan Penjelasan. Alumni Press.

Fajri, I. N. (2021). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Dengan Jaminan Fidusia (Studi Kasus Di Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sendang Artha Mandiri Madiun). Akuntansi, 9(1), 26–35.

Hayat, H. (2015). Keadilan Sebagai Prinsip Negara Hukum: Tinjauan Teoritis Dalam Konsep Demokrasi. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal Of Law), 2(2), 388–408. Https://Doi.Org/10.22304/Pjih.V2n2.A10

Kelsen, H. (2016). Teori Umum Tentang Hukum Dan Negara. Bandung: Nusamedia. Nusamedia.

Kurniawan, N. (2013). Hukum Kepailitan ( Studi Komparatif Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian Dan Kepailitan ). Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 1(3), 9.

Nursariani Simatupang, R. A. (2020). Kata Sepakat Dalam Perjanjian Dan Relevansinya Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Wanprestasi. Hukum, 5(1), 1–9.

Panggabean, R. M. (2010). Keabsahan Perjanjian Dengan Klausul Baku. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 17(4), 651–667. Https://Doi.Org/10.20885/Iustum.Vol17.Iss4.Art8

Panjaitan, E. L. (2018). Hukum Dan Keadilan Dalam Persfektif Filsafat Hukum. To-Ra, 4(2), 47. Https://Doi.Org/10.33541/Tora.V4i2.1183

Romadhina, A. P. (2018). Pengaruh Free Cash Flow, Non Debt Tax Shield Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang. Jurnal I;Miah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang, 6(1), 97–121. Http://Openjournal.Unpam.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jia/Article/View/1210

Ruman, Y. S. (2012). Keadilan Hukum Dan Penerapannya Dalam Pengadilan. Humaniora, 3(2), 345. Https://Doi.Org/10.21512/Humaniora.V3i2.3327

Sihotang, E. (2017). Itikad Baik Penguasaan Fisik Sebagai Dasar Perolehan Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 269pk/Pdt/2015). Magister Kenotariatan Usu, 01(02), 1–21.

Simamora, N. A., Kamello, T., Sembiring, R., & Leviza, J. (2015). Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Pendahuluan (Voor Overeenkomst) Pada Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negri Simalungun No 37/Pdt/Plw/2012/Sim). Usu Law Journal, 3(3), 84–96.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D.

Suwardiyati, R. (2020). Penerapan Asas Kepatutan Dalam Perjanjian Kawin. Widya Yuridika, 3(2), 271. Https://Doi.Org/10.31328/Wy.V3i2.1675

Downloads

Published

2023-08-12

How to Cite

The Debt of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia Against PT. Cipta Marga Nusaphala Persada : Perspective of Good Faith, Adequacy, and Fairness. (2023). Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 15(2), 280-290. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i2.6586

Similar Articles

1-10 of 29

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.