Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 4, 2024
Accepted
Aug 20, 2024
Published
Aug 21, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 209 Download : 191

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Progressive law is based on the emergence of a sense of dissatisfaction with the theory that has been developed and used as a guide in legal practice in Indonesia, legal theories that have been developed so far, are unable to respond to problems that occur in the reality of society. This has resulted in a sense of public dissatisfaction with the performance of the law and the courts. The value of justice is the main goal to be achieved in law enforcement efforts. Meanwhile, in the case of marriage annulment, there are parties who are dissatisfied with the decision of the first level judge, so they take legal action to a higher level court to answer their dissatisfaction. This research uses a qualitative method with an empirical juridical approach. Primary data obtained from marriage annulment decisions Number 185/Pdt.G/2023/PTA.Bdg, 84/Pdt.G/2023/PTA.Bdg and 106/Pdt.G/2023/PTA.bdg, secondary data obtained from laws, journals and other legal books that have the same relevance as this research. After the data is collected, data analysis is carried out to get answers to the problems raised. This research resulted in several findings. First, the application of progressive law in polygamy licensing cases uses the hermeneutic method, namely the school of philosophy that studies the nature of something to understand something into a clearer object of interpretation, in the case of forced marriage using the legal interpretation method, namely a conclusion in providing an explanation or understanding of a term that is unclear in meaning. Second, the door for judges to apply progressive law will never be closed, in fact it is a necessity by judges, legal problems will continue to exist and continue to develop.

Keywords

Progressive Law Marriage Annulment Judge's Decision

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Azmi, N. N., Bisri, H., Solehudin, E., Saepullah, U., & Ridwan, A. H. (2024). Application of Progressive Law to Marriage Annulment Cases: Prospects and Development in Indonesia’s Religious Court. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i1.9230

References

  1. Abdul Manan, Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2005).
  2. Abdulkodir Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti 2004).
  3. Ahmad Rifai, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progrsif, ed. oleh Tarmizi (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010).
  4. Ahmaf Rifai, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif (Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2010).
  5. Amiur Nuruddin, Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2004).
  6. Asep Bambang Hermanto, “Ajaran Positivisme Hukum Di Indonesia: Kritik Dan Alternatif Solusinya,” Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik) 2, no. 4 (2016): 108–21, http://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/selisik/article/view/650.
  7. Bakri A. Rahman dan Ahmad Sukardja, Hukum Menurut Islam, UUP dan Hukum Perdata/BW, ( Jakarta: PT Hidakarya Agung Jakarta, 1981)Bandingkan dengan Riduan Syahrani Abdurrahman, Masalah-masalah Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia, (Jakarta: PT Media Sarana Press, 1986).
  8. Bambang Waluyo Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek (jakarta: Sinar Grafika 2002).
  9. Bayu Setiawan, “Penerapan Hukum Progresif oleh Hakim Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif Transendensi,” Kosmik Hukum 18, no. 1 (2018): 159–79, https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v18i1.2338.
  10. Binsar M. Gultom, Pandangan Kritis Seorang Hakim Dalam Penegakkan Hukum di Indonesia, (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2015).
  11. Edi Rosman, “Paradigma Sosiologi Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia (Rekonstruksi Paradigma Integratif Kritis),” Al-Hurriyah 14, no. 1 (2013): 59–78, https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v9i1.511.
  12. Haerani, Ruslan. 2024. “The Legal Consequences Of Underage Marriage In The Merariq Culture Of The Sasak Tribe In Merembu Village, Labuapi District, West Lombok Regency”. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 2 (1):101-24. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v2i1.33.
  13. Haris, Ahmad, Edy Lisdiyono, and Setiyowati. 2024. “The Reconstruction of Religious Court Decision Execution on the Fulfilment of Children’s Rights Post-Divorce in Indonesia”. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental 18 (7). São Paulo (SP):e5564. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-035.
  14. Hasaziduhu Moho, “Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan,” Universitas Dharmawangsa 13, No. 1 (2019):
  15. Hwian Christianto, “Penafsiran Hukum Progresif Dalam Perkara Pidana,” Mimbar Hukum 23, no. 3 (2011): 479–500, https://doi.org/10.20303/jmh.v23i3.260.
  16. Jimly Asshiddiqie, Menuju Negara Hukum yang Demokratis (Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2008).
  17. Julisa Sistyawan, Dwanda, Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti, Lexy Fatharany Kurniawan, Loso Judijanto, and Zulkifli Makkawaru. 2024. “The Position of the Van Dading Deed in the Settlement of Joint Property Disputes: Study of Decision 901/Pdt.G/2023/PA. Tmg”. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 11 (1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8811.
  18. Kusnu Goesniadhie S., “Perspektif Moral Penegakan Hukum Yang Baik,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 17, no. 2 (2010): 195–216, https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art2.
  19. Luh Gede Siska Dewi Gelgel dan I Made Sarjana, Pelaksanaan Contra legem Oleh hakim penjabaran nilaihukum progresif, (Bagian Hukum Perdata Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana).
  20. M Syamsudin, “Rekonstruksi Pola Pikir Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Korupsi Berbasis Hukum Progresif,” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 11, no. 1 (2011): 11–21, https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.11.
  21. M Syamsudin, “Rekonstruksi Pola Pikir Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Korupsi Berbasis Hukum Progresif,”
  22. Muhammad Maisan Abdul Ghani, Ghina Ulpah, Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti, and Diana Farid. 2024. “PERKEMBANGAN HUKUM ISLAM PASCA PERIODE TAQLID (KEMAPANAN MAZHAB)”. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 1 (1):68-85. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v1i1.5.
  23. M. Hatta Ali, “Membangun Peradilan Berwibawa Melalui Peningkatan Kepercayaan Publik dan Independensi Lmebaga Peradilan” dalam Syarif Mappiasse, Logika Hukum Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim, (Jakarta: PRENADAMEDIA GROUP, 2013)
  24. M. Yasin Al Arif, “Penegakan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif,” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 1 (2019): 169–92, https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.1.169-192.
  25. Mardani, Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2016).
  26. Putra Astomo, “Prinsip-Prinsip Negara Hukum Indonesiadalam UUD Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945,” Jurnal Hukum Unsulbar 1, no. 1 (2018): h., 1–12, https://doi.org/10.31605/j-law.v1i1.47
  27. Redaksi RAS, Tip Hukum Praktis: Upaya Menghadapi Kasus Pidana, (Depok: Raih Asa Sukses, 2010), cet.ke-1.
  28. Rinrin Warisni Pribadi, “Pembaruan Hukum Islam melalui Yurisprudensi Peradilan Agama,” At-Tatbiq 04, no. 1 (2019): 41–56.
  29. Riduan Syahrani Abdurrahman, Masalah-masalah Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia, (Jakarta: PT Media Sarana Press, 1986).
  30. Satjipto Rahardjo, “Hukum itu Manusia, Bukan Mesin,” in Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: Catatan Kritis tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum (Jakarta: Kompas, 2007).
  31. Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009), xiii.
  32. Satjipto Rahardjo, Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009).
  33. Suharsimi Arikunto Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta 2012).
  34. Suteki, “Rekam Jejak Pemikiran Hukum Progresif Satjipto Rahardjo,” in Satjipto Rahardjo dan Hukum Progresif: Urgensi dan Kritik, ed. oleh Myrna A Safitri; Awaludin Marwan; Yance Arizona (Jakarta, 2011).
  35. Suwito, putusan Hakim yang Progresif dalam Perkara Perdata, (Hasanuddin Law riview. 2015).
  36. Syahrul Sitorus, "Upaya Hukum Dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali dan Derden Verzet)." Hikmah 15.1 (2018):
  37. Syarifuddin Latif, Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia Buku 2, (Watampone: Berkah Utami, 2010).
  38. Tata Wijayanta dan Hery Firmansyah, Perbedaan Pendapat dalam Putusan Pengadilan, (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Medpress Digital, 2013).