Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 20, 2024
Accepted
Nov 13, 2024
Published
Nov 18, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 81 Download : 14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The settlement of joint property between husband and wife after divorce often ends up in the Religious Court, even reaching the level of cassation and judicial review (PK), such as in the Supreme Court Decision Number Register 159/K/AG/2018. In this case, especially related to disputes over joint property in marriages with minor children, the Supreme Court not only refers to the normative law contained in the law, but also considers a sense of justice and benefit. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method with an empirical juridical approach. This approach is referred to as empirical legal research because it focuses on analyzing the implementation of normative legal provisions directly (in action) in certain legal events in society. Primary data was obtained from Supreme Court decision No 159 K/Ag/2018, No 618/Pdt.G/2012/PA.Bkt, No 38/Pdt.G/2013/PTA.Pdg, No 88K/Ag/2015, No 159/K/AG/2018, No 99/Pdt.G/2023/MS, as well as laws related to the research being discussed. Secondary data is obtained from books, scientific articles and previous research results related to joint property and those that have the same discussion. Data collection techniques using literature study and qualitative data analysis are used to explore certain phenomena and find out the causes. The results showed that the Supreme Court judge in deciding this case used the method of legal discovery through legal interpretation, especially systematic interpretation and sociological interpretation. In the case, the judge postponed the division of joint property until the children of the disputing parties reached the age of mumayyiz, thus showing attention to aspects of substantive justice. Systematic and sociological legal interpretations by judges show that in resolving post-divorce joint property disputes, especially those involving minors, judges must consider the social realities that live in society to actualize justice. This emphasizes the role of judges not only as law enforcers, but also as guardians of the public good. This research concludes that legal discovery by judges through interpretation based on systematic and sociological approaches can realize concrete justice in society, especially in divorce cases involving children.

Keywords

Family Law Joint Property Supreme Court's Decision Divorce

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Bakti Ritonga, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Nurrohman, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Burhanuddin, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Ahmad Hasan Ridwan, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Indonesia

UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

How to Cite
Ritonga, B., Mukhlas, O. S., Nurrohman, Burhanuddin, & Ridwan, A. H. (2024). Islamic Family Law Reform in Indonesia: A Review of the Supreme Court’s Decision on the Postponement of the Distribution of Joint Property. Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(2), 292-311. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i2.9667

References

  1. Ade Irwina Safitri, Zulis Mariastutik, and Muhammad Andri. “Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Menurut Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Justicia Journal 11, no. 1 (March 21, 2022): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.32492/jj.v11i1.11102.
  2. Aep, and Saepulloh Darusmanwiati. “Hak Dan Kewajiban Suami Isteri.” Jurnal Qolamuna 1, no. 1 (2015).
  3. Andy.N, Nofri, and Siti Humairah. “Preservation Of Uang Asap Tradition In Melayu Wedding: Maqāsid Shari’ah Perspective.” Shakhsiyah Burhaniyah: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (January 31, 2022): 51–76. https://doi.org/10.33752/sbjphi.v7i1.3938.
  4. Anindya Harimurti, Dwi. “perbandingan pembagian harta bersama menurut hukum positif dan hukum islam.” Jurnal Gagasan Hukum 3, no. 02 (December 29, 2021): 149–71. https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i02.8908.
  5. Arrisman. Hukum Perikatan Perdata Dan Hukum Perikatan Islam Di Indonesia, 2020.
  6. Basith, Junaidy Abdul. “Harta Bersama Dalam Hukum Islam Di Indonesia (Perspektif Sosiologis).” Al-Qanun 17, no. 2 (2014).
  7. Bernard, L, Yoan N Simanjuntak, Markus Y Hage, Bernard L Tanya, Yoan N Simanjuntak, and Markus Y Hage. Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang Dan Generasi. Genta Publishing, 2010.
  8. Budi, Kukuh Pramono, Ghansham Anand, Shintya Yulfa Septiningrum, Nur Ezan Rahmat, and Xavier Nugraha. “Adjudicating Joint Property Dispute in Islamic Jurisprudence: Balancing The Best Interests of The Child With A Focus on Residency.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 23, no. 2 (March 7, 2024): 245–66. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v23i2.12278.
  9. Dayu, Wulan. “Perempuan Dalam Pusaran Perkawinan; Antara Hak Dan Kewajiban.” Journal of Gender and Social Inclusion in Muslim Societies 2, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 84. https://doi.org/10.30829/jgsims.v2i2.10047.
  10. Fachrunisa, Syifa, Rezki Suci Qamaria, and Nurul Hanani. “Judges’ Perspectives on the Determination of the Amount of Mut’ah, Childbirth Costs, and Child Sustenance in Divorce Cases (The Study on the Court’s Decision Number 808/Pdt.G/2021/Pa. Kab. Kdr).” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 6, no. 1 (September 26, 2023): 54. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i1.15537.
  11. Fernandho, Dauglas. “Reformulasi Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Memaksimalkan Pemeriksaan Perkara Money Laundering Dengan Predicate Crime Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Litigasi 19, no. 2 (January 1, 2020). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v19i2.922.
  12. Fitri, Abdul Basit Misbachul. “Hak Dan Kewajiban Suami Isteri Dalam Islam Dan Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Usratuna: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 3, no. 1 (December 31, 2019): 49–67. https://doi.org/10.29062/usratuna.v3i1.154.
  13. H. Herman Fikri, SH, M. Hum. “Penerapan Undang-Undang No-5 Tahun 2011 Tentang Akuntan Publik Dalam Kaitannya Terhadap Penegakkan Hukum Kejahatan Akuntansi.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 2 (2015).
  14. Hafis, Muhammad, Jumni Nelli, and Nia Elmiati. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Perubahan Perjanjian Perkawinan Dalam Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 19 Tahun 2018.” Hukum Islam 22, no. 2 (January 5, 2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.24014/jhi.v22i2.19436.
  15. Hamdan, Hamdan Arief Hanif, and Yoni Irma Yunita. “Derajat Mahar Dalam Proses Perkawinan Tinjauan Fikih Munakahat.” Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH) 5, no. 1 (May 5, 2023): 19–32. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol5.iss1.art2.
  16. Hasanah, Uswatun, and Chitra Latiffani. “Kajian Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Journal of Science and Social Research I, no. 2 (2018): 137–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v1i2.220.
  17. Junaidy, Abdul Basith. “Harta Bersama Dalam Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.” Al-Qanun 17, no. 2 (2014).
  18. Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa, and Rahmi Hidayati. “The Jurimetri Formulation of Court Decisions in the Division of Joint Property.” SMART: Journal of Sharia, Traditon, and Modernity 3, no. 1 (July 30, 2023): 28. https://doi.org/10.24042/smart.v3i1.16978.
  19. Khusairi, Halil, and Ican Mandala. “Perkawinan Adat: Analisis Hukum Dan Sistem Perkawinan Di Kerinci Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Istinbath 21, no. 2 (January 28, 2023): 227–42. https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v21i2.565.
  20. Limbong, Panal Herbet, Syawal Amry Siregar, and Muhammad Yasid. “Pengaturan Hukum Dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Perdata Yang Berlaku Saat Ini Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Retentum 5, no. 2 (September 24, 2023): 177. https://doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v5i2.1346.
  21. Maroni, -, Rini Fathonah, Nenny Dwi Ariani, and Mashuril Anwar. “Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Menunjang Pembangunan Nasional (Studi Di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pada Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Tanjung Karang).” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 4 (May 31, 2021): 937. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no4.2864.
  22. Marwa, Muhammad Habibi Miftakhul. “Model Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perkawinan Perspektif Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 4, no. 2 (November 27, 2021): 777. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4059.
  23. Maryam, Siti, Qurotul Aini, M Yusuf, M Misbahul Amin, and Slamet Arofik. “Pembelajaran Fikih Munakahat Dalam Mewujudkan Keluarga SAMAWA Pada Komunitas Muslimat NU Dusun Gondang Barat Gondang Pace Nganjuk.” Dharma: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarkat 3, no. ``1 (2023).
  24. Mawardi, Mawardi. “Al-‘Uqud Al-Murakkabah Sebagai Progresifitas Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Pengembangan Akad-Akad Perbankan Syariah Di Indonesia.” Hukum Islam 18, no. 2 (August 1, 2019): 69. https://doi.org/10.24014/hi.v18i2.6693.
  25. Nasution, Hotnidah. “Implementation Of The Principle Of Ultra Petitum Partium In Deciding Children Livelihood In Divorce Lawsuit In Religious Courts.” Ahkam : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 18, no. 1 (January 12, 2018). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v18i1.7488.
  26. Nur, Ahmad. “Status Perwalian Janda Pasca Perceraian Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Al-Bayyinah 2, no. 1 (June 29, 2018): 109–24. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v2i1.42.
  27. Pelu, Ibnu Elmi As, and Ahmad Dakhoir. “Marital Property within the Marriage Law: A Debate on Legal Position and Actual Applications.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 59, no. 2 (November 11, 2021): 287–316. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.287-316.
  28. Pradikta, Hervin Yoki, F. Faisal, Erina Pane, and Evi Muafiah. “The Paradigm Of Judge’s Thoughts In The Settlement Of Islamic Inheritance Cases And Their Implications On Family Law Renewal In Indonesia (Study on Supreme Court Decision Number 721 K/Ag/2015, Supreme Court Decision Number 218 K/Ag/2016, and Supreme Court.” SMART: Journal of Sharia, Traditon, and Modernity 1, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 161. https://doi.org/10.24042/smart.v1i2.11037.
  29. Rohman, Adi Nur, - Sugeng, and Hesti Widyaningrum. “Instrumentation Of Ex-Officio Rights Of Religious Courts Judge Related To Fulfilling Children And Wife’s Rights Due To Divorce.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 2 (September 28, 2020): 361. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no2.2581.
  30. Rotikan, Karter Jimmy, Fahmiron, Susi Delmiati, and Ade Onny Siagian. Bunga Rampai Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Eureka Media Aksara, 2022.
  31. SALLOM, DEA SALMA. “Interpretasi Terhadap Syarat Ijab Kabul Ittihad Al-Majlis Dalam Akad Nikah Perspektif Ulama Empat Madzhab.” Hukum Islam 22, no. 2 (March 14, 2023): 152. https://doi.org/10.24014/jhi.v22i2.17428.
  32. Sari, Yessy Meryantika. “Legal Protection For Customer Segregated Account Owner From Loss Due To The Bankcrupty Of Futures Brokerage Firm.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 16, no. 2 (May 10, 2016). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.2.512.
  33. Setiyono, Setiyono, Sugeng Supartono, Dinda Keumala, and Khairani Bakri. “Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Terhadap Penetapan Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Aspek Kepastian Hukum Dan Aspek Kemanfaatan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu.” Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti, September 27, 2023, 87–114. https://doi.org/10.25105/ferenda.v1i2.18280.
  34. Suherman. “Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Peradilan Agama.” Al Maslahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 1, no. 7 (2017).
  35. ———. “Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia.” Al Maslahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 1, no. 7 (2014).
  36. Tanjung, Aminah, and Mariadi Mariadi. “Implications of Postponing the Distribution of Inheritance from an Islamic Legal Perspective.” Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 10, no. 2 (December 31, 2023): 233–46. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v10i2.7200.
  37. Tarais, Yuliani, and Hartini Hartini. “Qualification of Child Status from Unregistered Polygamous Marriage without Marriage Validation (Study of Religious Court Decisions from 2019-2022).” Pandecta Research Law Journal 18, no. 1 (June 23, 2023): 112–22. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v18i1.45534.
  38. Tiranda, Irianto, Fenty Puluhulawa, and Johan Jasin. “Konsep Ideal Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pungutan Liar Berdasarkan Asas Peradilan.” Jambura Law Review 1, no. 2 (July 29, 2019): 120–43. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i2.2119.
  39. Ulang, Mengulik, Perdebatan Positivisme Hukum, Dan Teori, Hukum Kodrat, H L A Hart, and Lon F Fuller. “Hukum Dan Moral.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021).
  40. Waha, Felicitas Marcelina. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Atas Harta Perkawinan Setelah Bercerai.” Lex Et Societatis 1, no. 1 (March 31, 2013). https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v1i1.1310.
  41. Wahyu. “Penemuan Hukum Yang Berkarakter Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Wasaka Hukum 9, no. 1 (2021).
  42. Wardhana, Wisjnu, Edi Yunara, and Mahmud Mulyadi. “Pengembalian Barang Bukti Kepada Yang Berhak Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 2, no. 9 (2023).
  43. Wignjodipoero, Soerojo. Pengantar Dan Asas-Asas Hukum Adat. Gunung Agung, 1995.
  44. Xavier Nugraha, Dkk. Iuris Muda : Bunga Rampai Ilmu Hukum. Cv Penerbit Harfeey, 2019.
  45. Zaelani, Abdul Qodir, Syamsul Hilal, and Abdul Hanif. “Joint Property Inheritance Distribution Practiced by Community of Bandar Lampung.” Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Dan Penelitian Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (January 12, 2022): 101–14. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v5i1.15561.
  46. Zubair, Asni, Hamzah Latif, and Al Furqon Dono Hariyanto. “The Construction of Inheritance Law Reform in Indonesia: Questioning the Transfer of Properties through Wasiat Wājibah to Non-Muslim Heirs.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (June 27, 2022): 176. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.12628.