Main Article Content

Abstract

Every student has different style in understanding a concept of learning. The different style of learning is called students’ uniqueness and it is influenced cognitive style of students themselves. Cognitive style is clearly seen when students receive mathematical concept that requires good reasoning abilities. This study aims to determine how students process information and reasoning given based on cognitive styles in this case reflective and impulsive cognitive style. The subjects of this study were students of grade XI MAS Al-Jami'atul Washliyah Stabat. Through the stages of the MFFT (Matching Familiar Figure Test), two students were selected, each with a reflective and impulsive cognitive style. The two students were given mathematical reasoning tests questions on trigonometry concept and afterward conducted interviews to deepen the data. Data were analysed using triangulation, data reduction, data presentation and verification. The results of the study showed that in doing the tests given, students with a reflective style tend to be thorough and correct with a longer duration of time than students with an impulsive style, and vice versa.

Keywords

Reflective Cognitive Style Impulsive Cognitive Style Mathematical Reasoning

Article Details

How to Cite
Faisal, F., Srimuliati, S., Ulya, K., & Damayanti, L. (2023). Profil Penalaran Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 7(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v7i1.6162

References

  1. Aprilia, N. C., Sunardi., & Trapsilasiwi, D. (2015). Proses berpikir siswa gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif dalam memecahkan masalah matematika di kelas VII SMPN 11 Jember. Jurnal Edukasi, 2(3), 31-37.
  2. Ario, M. (2016). Analisis kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa SMK setelah mengikuti pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Ilmiah Edu Research, 5(2), 125–134.
  3. Rozencwajg, Paulette & Corroyer, Denis. (2005). Cognitive processes in the reflective-impulsive cognitive style. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(4), 451-463.
  4. Sugiyono. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.