MUNÂSABAH BETWEEN CHAPTERS ON QUR'AN IN THE AL-BIQÂ'Î PERSPECTIVE

person

Ahmad Zainal Abidin

Institut Agama Islam Negeri Tulungagung, Indonesia

person

Ahmad Saddad

Institut Agama Islam Negeri Tulungagung, Indonesia

DOI: 10.32505/at-tibyan.v5i2.1480 inbox Received: 2020-03-20 check_circle Published: December 11, 2020 pp. 345-363

article Abstract

The Study on munÄsabah occupies an important position in the study of the Koran. Al-BiqÄ'î is one of the scholars who give a very large portion of the theory of munÄsabah. Al-BiqÄ'î divides munÄsabah into two major groups, namely, between surah (chapters) and between ayat (verses). With an exploratory-descriptive method, this paper will specifically explore logical pattern of munÄsabah between surah according to al-Biqa'i with a comprehensive example. The findings of this paper are based on: first, there are four possible patterns of munÄsabah between surah according to al-Biqa'i. The four patterns are munÄsabah between surah' names and its content, munÄsabah between surah and basmalah, munÄsabah between the initial description of the surahs and munÄsabah between the end of the surah and the other surah. Second, al-Biqa'i in applying a munÄsabah theory is quite consistent across patterns; from the first, second, third, and fourth patterns. Third, MunÄsabah occupies a very important position because it is able to explain the unity and close relationship that exists between one surah and another while also emphasize the oneness of the Qur'anic themes.

Keywords

Al-Biqā’î Munāsabah Surah Consistent
picture_as_pdf

Full Text Manuscript

PDF

download Download PDF

Authors

person

Ahmad Zainal Abidin

Institut Agama Islam Negeri Tulungagung, Indonesia

person

Ahmad Saddad

Institut Agama Islam Negeri Tulungagung, Indonesia

format_list_numbered References

  1. 1. Abidin, Thoriqul Aziz dan Ahmad Zainal. “Pendekatan Munasabah Psikologiah Muhammad Ahmad Khalafullah: Analisis Kisah Luth Dan Kaumnya Dalam Al-Qur’an,” Jurnal Nun 5 no.2 (2019): 151-183. http//10.32495/nun.v5i2.94.
  2. 2. Affani, Syukron. “Diskursus Munāsabah: Problem Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān Bi ’l-Qur’ān,” Jurnal Theologia 28, no. 2 (2017): 391-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/teo. 2017.28.2.1443.
  3. 3. Ahmad, Suryadi dan Rudi. “Signifikansi MunāsabahAyat Al-Qur’an Dalam Tafsir Pendidikan.” Jurnal Ulul Al-Bab 17, no. 1 (2016).
  4. 4. Al-‘A’zami, M.M. Sejarah Teks Al-Qur’an Dari Wahyu Sampai Kompilasi: Kajian Perbandingan Dengan Perjanjian Lama Dan Perjanjian Baru, 2014.
  5. 5. Al-Biqa’i, Burhan al-Din. Nazm Al-Durar Fi Tsanasub Al-Ayat Wa Al-Suwar. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 2006.
  6. 6. Al-Biqa’i, Burhan al-Din Abi al-Hasan Ibrahim bin ’Umar. Nazm Al-Durar Al-Suwar, Fi Tanasub Al-Ayat Wa. Kairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Islami, 1984.
  7. 7. Al-Zarkasyi. Al-Burhan Fi ‘Ulum Al-Qur’An. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1957.
  8. 8. Al-Zarqani, Muhammad ،Abd al-’Azim. Manahil Al-‘lrfan Fti‘Ulum Al- Qur’An. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1998.
  9. 9. Badruzaman, Abad. Ulumul Qur’an: Pendekatan Dan Wawasan Baru. Malang: Madani Media, 2018.
  10. 10. Bakar, Abu. “Kontekstualisasi MunāsabahPada Tafsir Mushaf Dan Tafsir Nuzuli: Analisis Komparatif Antara Afsir Tartib Al-Mushaf Dan Tafsir Tartib Al-Nuzul.” Jurnal Dialogia 14, no. 2 (2016).
  11. 11. Fath, Amir Faishol. The Unity of Al-Qur’an, Terj. Nasiruddin Abbas. Jakarta: Pustaka Al- Kautsar, 2010.
  12. 12. akim, Lukmanul. “MunāsabahAyat Dalam Surat Al-Naba’ (Analisis Metodologi Penafsiran Abdullah Darraz Dalam Kitab Al-Nabau Al-Azim Nazratun Jadidatun Fi Al-Qur’an).” Jurnal An-Nida 41, no. 2 (2017).
  13. 13. Jabir, M. “Korelasi (Munasabah) Ayat Dan Surah Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Hunafa 3, no. 2 (2006).
  14. 14. Khalifah, Haji. Kasyf Al-Zunun ‘an Asas Al-Kutub Wa Al-Funun, Dalam Amir Faishol Fath, The Unity or The Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2010.
  15. 15. Mahfuz. “Analisis Al-MunāsabahFi Al-Qur’an; Antara Orientasi I’ja>z Dan Orientasi Wihdah.” Jurnal Tribakti 25, no. 1 (2014) 88-97 https://doi.org/10.33367/ tribakti.v25i1.161.
  16. 16. Said, Hasani Ahmad. Diskursus MunāsabahAl-Quran Dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah. Jakarta: Amzah, 2015.
  17. 17. ———. “Menggagas Munāsabah Al-Qur’an: Peran Dan Model Penafsiran Al-Qur’an.” Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika 13, no. 1 (2016): 1- 34. https://doi.org/10.24239/ jsi.v13i1.412.1-34.
  18. 18. ———. “Potret Studi Al-Qur’an Di Mata Orientalis,” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur'an dan Tafsir 3 no. 1 (2018): 22-41. https://doi.org/10.32505/ tibyan. v3i1.474.
  19. 19. ———. “Tafsir Al-Mishbah In The Frame Work Of Indonesian Golden Triangle Tafsirs: A Review On The Correlation Study (Munasabah) Of Quran.” Heritage Of Nusantara 3, no. 2 (2014): 212.
  20. 20. Shihab, M Quraish, dkk. Sejarah Dan Ulum Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2001.
  21. 21. Sherly Devani, Wawan Hernawan dan Izzah Faizah Siti R.K. “MunāsabahDalam Safwah Al-Tafasir Karya Muhammad ’ALi Al-Sabuni.” Jurnal Al-Bayan 2, no. 2 (2017).
  22. 22. Shihab, M. Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir: Syarat, Ketentuan, Dan Aturan Yag Patut Anda Ketahui Dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur’an. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2015.
  23. 23. Supriyanto, John. “MunāsabahAl-Qur’an; Studi Korelatif Antar Surat Bacaan Shalat-Shalat Nabi.” Jurnal Intizar 19, no. 1 (2013): 47-68
  24. 24. Syukron, Affani. “Diskursus Munāsabah: Problem Tafsîr Al-Qur’ān Bi ’l-Qur’ān.” Jurnal Theologia 28, no. 2 (2017): 403.
  25. 25. Yusuf, M. “MunāsabahDalam Al-Qur’an (Suatu Kajian Tentang I’jaz Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Tajdid 11, no. 2 (2012).
  26. 26. Zayd, Nasr Hamid Abu. Mafhum Al-Nas: Dirasah Fi‘Ulum Al- Qur’an. Kairo: Dar al-Ihya al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, 1992.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 175

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.